$EXPR really ran up despite continues bad results/guidance. Earnings tomorrow.
The product is bad and expensive. That style of fashion has a headwind. Cash flows steadily dropping. Leases are the hidden liability.
-
Show this thread
-
Comp sales -5% yoy. -2% guidance for Q4 compared to -6% last year is positive. Still not the turn around needed but at least a step in the right direction. So expect some jump. They're buying back some shares which accelerates how fast this will play out, which is nice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @orrdavid
B&M retail apparel not using Zara/Uniqlo/H&M manufacturing methods are not viable.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I'm pretty confidently short here - especially because I think their shirts are the worst. Investors put way too much hope into these turnarounds. We both see -2% compared to -6% last year. They see an improvement. I see yet another decline, the last thing they need.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @orrdavid
So long as they are not fucking with the numbers or they don’t get weirdly lucky in some way (kardashian wears some top they have) you should be good.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
What specifically do the fast fashion brands do differently? I don't know how Uniqlo does it, but they have much higher quality at a third the price of
$EXPR. Not even in the same ballpark, I think.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orrdavid
Generally (excluding Ralph Lauren collared shirts), what will sell season to season is highly unpredictable, so the fast fashion companies make smaller runs of everything until they see a winner. Early high sales are a consistent indicator of season-long high sales, so after
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
Seeing a positive signal they bet big. They’ve set their supply chain to be as fast possible. In some cases they’ll buy huge amounts of fabric in advance and just make different designs with it until one hits. They don’t make orders with factories, they instead book production
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
Time. Again, this allows them to be flexible in response to demand. Zara will do some manufacturing (in particular what can be automated) in Spain for speed. Then they sell at a low price, which gives great leverage with all their volume oriented suppliers because of volume.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
One of the biggest costs in the industry is the markdown from creating too many of a poor seller (or not having enough of a good seller). The fast fashion cos have greatly motivated this problem. Contrast to Macy’s, which will in March 2020 decide how many pink polka dot dresses
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
They will buy (and thus sell) in June 2021.
-
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
Also worth mentioning that the burden of brick and mortar goes way down the more volume you can drive through it. That $/sqft starts to look small with a big sales volume divisor.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.