Mike Bloomberg (paraphrasing): “Tax poor people more regressively to manipulate their lifestyle choices so that they live longer.” Hoo boy.
-
-
Replying to @TruthGundlach
He’s right. We need a different healthcare system in this country and if taxpayers are paying for the poors healthcare they shouldn’t be allowed to guzzle soda and smoke like a chimney tax free.
4 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @TruthGundlach
But cancer patients put less stress on public healthcare as they avoid the later years of healthcare, which are by far the most costly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @obstaclecap @TruthGundlach
Varies by disease and prognosis. What about diabetics?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @TruthGundlach
Haven't come any specific calculation for diabetics, but given it reduces life expectancy by a significant amount (estimates around 8 years) the odds are that it also costs tax payers less than average. 8 less years of care + avoidance of late care costs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Most governments of the world put heavy taxes on 'sin' products given their possible cost externalities on the health care system. Now that we are finding the opposite might be true, will they remove those taxes?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Depends on the product. If it’s as simple as that, we should, but it’s likely not that simple.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.