Cheap efficient trucking is the most often cited cause of the decline of cargo rail transit in the United States, but after studying cargo rail, I believe that trucking is only a piece of the puzzle. 1/n
Show this thread
-
Here are some standard intermodal containers on a train. Their only doors are at the back and because they are loaded in a long sequence forming a train, there's no way to unload the goods from a train. You need a truck. 5/npic.twitter.com/jHhznavNZn
Show this thread
So basically, even though it's many times more efficient to have goods sent directly to a warehouse by 100% train, you can't. You need a truck to bring the container from the warehouse to the train terminal and then you need another when it reaches the destination terminal 6/n
-
-
So your options are: use two trucks and a train or use one truck. One truck often wins out. It's faster, simpler, and unless you're going very long distances, more efficient. So these days, industrial spurs are only used for things made on the american continent i.e. 8/n
Show this thread -
Paper, wood, ore, soybeans, cars, etc. These things ship by train still and are often moved, loaded, and unloaded directly into warehouses without the use of interstate trucking. In summary, cheap trucking wasn't the rail killer alone. It needed the container to become the 9/n
Show this thread -
International standard, which outmoded warehouse to warehouse pure rail transport for an ever growing portion of the goods our country transports. 10/10
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've lived with the Boston-Portland freight line in my back yard for years now - it's all tanks, and lumber, and bulk containers. Very few intermodal containers. But there is a lot of volume moved on those tracks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.