The whole point of lower interest rates is to spur investment, so we can cure a lack of investment in economic downturns. Same idea with injecting liquidity into the system, i.e. printing money. What would happen if we spent an equivalent amount of money on an advertising
-
Show this thread
-
campaign that encouraged people to invest or become entrepreneurs?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I doubt it would work. And it would be an insanely huge sum of money to spend on advertising that even if it did work, you'd quickly run into diminishing gains. The most direct way to spur entrepreneurship is to provide subsidies (grants, tax breaks, etc.).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @svrnco
Well, what if we rephrase the question to be 5% advertising and 95% grants, tax breaks? Seems to me it'd work better. I keep coming back to the cantillon effect. It's also fairer to the people, the taxpayers, anyways.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
It would be a form of fiscal stimulus. Would work better than further monetary stimulus, but the tricky part is getting the implementation and politics right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Agreed. Same of course goes for giving money to banks instead of people.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.