I'm not authority on air safety, but I'm at a loss why people as sensible as engineers think making passenger planes increasingly more complicated to troubleshoot can be viewed as better/safer. Imagine if norm for bridge design was adding continually harder to assess parts.
-
-
Replying to @trishankkarthik @Barcode353 and
I read a comment several years ago, I forget from whom, which stated that large software applications are the most complex artefacts that have ever been undertaken by humanity. I don't know if that is quite so, but it is certainly close.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
-
Replying to @dwnhogendoorn @trishankkarthik and
Cities mostly grow and attempts at urban planning at best just hope to direct their energy in gentle ways. Cities that have been planned from the ground up haven't very successful; e.g., consider Brasília. In any event the level of human control doesn't approach that of coding.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @financequant @dwnhogendoorn and
Maybe the more interesting question is why do cities seem to be resistant to fast acting catastrophic failures. They are incrediably complex, and have the possibility for points of failure that can cascade through the entire system very quickly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sajadshaterian @financequant and
Tightness of integration (fault domains), the diversity of objectives (relatively fewer and more aligned in a software system), and other things affect the reliability and performance of complex systems That said, *are* cities that resistant to fast acting catastrophic failures?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @trishankkarthik @101010Lund and
Interesting. What are some examples?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.