I'm feeling like reading books is a way overrated way to learn. Maybe they're good for inspiration or new perspective, but I find it more rewarding and productive to analyze the features of life using "first principles."
Show this thread
-
The average book has the conclusions you already know to be true but needed the confirmation that not only yourself felt that way.
Meh, I'm not reading that book. If I think something is true, I don't need a book to confirm it.
-
-
That's not what I meant, I was agreeing with you. A large portion of books have what you already know to be true inside but some ppl just need the confirmation of another POV for it to feel valid to them. What I was trying to convey^
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.