I'm feeling like reading books is a way overrated way to learn. Maybe they're good for inspiration or new perspective, but I find it more rewarding and productive to analyze the features of life using "first principles."
Show this thread
-
Not sure i understand the distinction. Books can argue from first principles. Maybe what you mean is you're method is more effective because it's shorter, more to the point, dialectical?
Most books don't argue with first principles. Those that do pack in tons of filler. I don't know what dialectical means but what you wrote sounds right.
-
-
Dialectical is sort of a back and forth conversation between an argument and the counterargument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.