It's weird. And I'm not knowledgeable enough to give precise scientific answer. But I'd describe as I can do these rotations. But then if you ask me to describe the shape precisely I realize it was lower resolution
-
-
Replying to @adam_zethraeus @azthrs and
Yeah I have had discussions with others about this. Think this is mostly correct Need more robust way to test for this
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RealtimeAI @kevinakwok and
For me, I can see the red star really clearly. As I add more shapes I start to lose definition. I can see a circle inside a square easily but if you put a star inside the circle I need to start "tracing". There's a better way to describe this activity. When the images...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @RealtimeAI and
Get complex the image goes dark for me but I get a spotlight. I can put the spotlight on images on parts of the images to see those parts clearly. I think this happens because non-autistic eidectics have a limit to our working memory, i.e. the number of numbers you can remember.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @RealtimeAI and
For whatever it's worth, I think I am 99th percentile at this (I can play chess without looking at the board). For me I process all information through images and I don't understand how other people think, which is why I find aphantasia interesting. Anyways...my 2 cents.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @RealtimeAI and
Perhaps blindfold chess improved your muscle for this
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattCantor @RealtimeAI and
Meh, could be, but I think it was more like discovering that I could dunk.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @RealtimeAI and
That’s interesting. And I’m envious! Took many years before I could do it, and never well
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.