Are brands more or less powerful in the e-commerce era? I bet most people would say that they're less powerful because we have more choice. I think that's the wrong answer. Distribution is less important because is much more easily accessible.
So now, you have a dilemma; should you get tide or should you get something else that does the same thing? You'll probably grab Tide, but who knows? Maybe this time you'll try to save some money and get the store brand. Let's compare this situation to Amazon.pic.twitter.com/qZbJ6LoOSM
-
-
Should i get Tide? Or maybe...Tide? Or...well it seems to be that Tide is really the only laundry detergent on earth. The results keep going like this.pic.twitter.com/bAUYVTzGTA
Show this thread -
Tide's got this locked up. And were another brand to spend the money necessary to get some of those sponsored slots, they'd have to pay a pretty penny, given that their conversion rate would be much lower.
Show this thread -
So, anyways, that's why I think brands are more powerful, especially obscure ones that couldn't make it onto the shelves in the pre-internet era, today than ever. Proctor Gamble is losing its grip on your wallet, but that's a distribution, not a brand issue, to my mind.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.