What's depressing about lists like these is that regions like Dallas, Orlando, and Houston are building massive numbers of relatively high-density communities through multi-family units—but only a small share of those units are oriented toward walkability and transit use. https://t.co/1me5XHjw4e
-
-
First, there is a bus system that should address your hub-spoke point. And there are enough people moving between Plano and downtown (as opposed to Plano to like Frisco) for ridership. The problems are that the areas around the stations are not walkable.
-
So, if you want to get to a dart station, most likely you must drive. After you arrive, most likely you must drive again. Even if you courageously walk you must deal with very wide roads with fast cars. It's not pleasant. The other thing is that car travel is just so much faster!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Given the current density of Dallas and high cost and time involved in building rail, BRT would more than likely be a better investment.
-
The mode should probably be dictated by compatibility with the existing system. If a route aligns w/ an existing rail corridor, then rail might be the best option. In other places a BRT corridor shared by multiple bus routes might be best.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Circle wouldn’t be as useful as a few east west lines that don’t serve downtown Dallas. The current system suffers from long headways bc of all routes using downtown track (hence the new downtown route being planned), if some weren’t headed downtown then headways could be higher
-
Headways? Yeah that makes sense. They building the cottonbelt line that will do as you say.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.