Free transit in Tallinn caused transit mode share to rise 8 percentage points, 3 from cars and 5 from walking https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11116-016-9695-5 … via @caosplanejado
-
-
Replying to @MarketUrbanism @caosplanejado
Usually the obstacle to higher mass transit use is speed, not cost.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Walking is basically free but transit is faster. Switch to transit from cars sounds economic here but are there cities where a substantial switch to transit could cut congestion for everyone?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Every city is different, but in most American cities, in terms of speed: Cars > transit > walking In terms of cost for a single person: Cars > transit > walking In terms of cost for two or more people: Transit > Cars > walking
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So free transit would change the he 2 or more people numbers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
As I said earlier, the most important thing is speed (and then convenience). It would not have a meaningful effect on transit usage in most cities, except perhaps on the homeless.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.