I feel like someone wrote this before but deleted it but would the counterexample be Baltimore? Perhaps Montreal?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @nachkari @PinkPoloShorts
Bmore? I would've thought 1960 onwards but the data I found since 2000 painted a picture of rising prices that surprised me. Here's population Baltimore:pic.twitter.com/AJbiBXg4fL
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PinkPoloShorts @nachkari
Ok, interesting. I think it's still possible for Baltimore to have been a mediocre or bad investment. You had to be in the right area (whereas for most other cities like it you did not) and it's notable that wide swathes of the city are abandoned including parts with good bones.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So it sounds like old cities with good bones, once they reach a critical mass get real price appreciation unless: - Over-concentrated industry fails (Detroit) - Tax-payer flight to the suburbs (baby boom) - White flight (crime hits critical mass) - Volcano (Pompeii) - Others?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.