7/But in addition to land reform, Studwell says the government needs to support small gardening farmers with extension services, marketing, and infrastructure.
-
Show this thread
-
8/Studwell's second point - and the centerpiece of his book - is about manufacturing and exports. Studwell thinks developing countries need to force their companies to export, in order to make them more productive.
3 replies 13 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
9/Studwell coins a term, "export discipline", which basically means two things: 1. Governments incentivizing or even forcing companies to export 2. Global markets providing the "discipline" that forces these companies to raise productivity and find market niches
4 replies 22 retweets 102 likesShow this thread -
10/His theory, and his policy prescriptions, are remarkably similar to this 2004 paper by
@rodrikdani: http://www.vedegylet.hu/fejkrit/szvggyujt/rodrik_industrial_policy.pdf …1 reply 7 retweets 92 likesShow this thread -
11/Interestingly, Studwell doesn't put that much faith in currency undervaluation and trade surpluses. It's GROSS exports that matter for productivity gains in his telling, not NET exports. This is not a Trump-style story of trade as a zero-sum game.
5 replies 7 retweets 97 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Noahpinion
has been a while since I read Studwell. But don't remember it as being a critique of undervaluation as a strategy so much as an argument for forcing firms to export so as to discipline industrial policies -- e.g. Korea's auto sector did better than Malaysia's.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Brad_Setser @Noahpinion
if my memory is off let me know -- I really liked the book, thought it did a good job of describing various Asian industrial policies. but also remember thinking that emphasis on exports lent itself toward providing support for undervals
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Brad_Setser
No. Studwell thinks that culling ineffcient exporters is key, and undervaluation helps these. So he thinks it's way too blunt an instrument to be useful in technological upgrading.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Noahpinion
thanks -- need to reread. has been a long time (read it when it came out, so 6ys ago?)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Singapore story.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.