According to Karl Popper, hypotheses which are dense in the space of possible worlds are unscientific.
-
-
"Uncommon", "Relatively unlikely to be posited". Overall: An hypothesis X which, if true, would mostly yield observers who wouldn't posit X
-
Ah. Hypotheses which are evidence against themselves.
-
Like hypotheses that imply most observers are Boltzmann brains who would not have observed the evidence that suggested the hypothesis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sketch: Universal expansion would eventually birth many observers with starless skies and thus little reason to posit universal expansion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.