A widely believed incorrect proof allegedly shows that there are no uninteresting ordinals.
-
-
-
But being the smallest uninteresting ordinal is not itself an interesting property.
-
In fact, the smallest uninteresting ordinal is the successor to the Church-Kleene ordinal.
-
Notice how, even knowing that fact, you still don't care about the successor to the Church-Kleene ordinal.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's just the empty set. All ordinals are beautiful ❤︎
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.