It is impossible to argue that the first two decades of mathematical research in this century have produced any innovations as profound as group representation theory, functional analysis, dynamical systems theory, the geometry of fiber bundles, or class field theory.
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Great researchers in mathematics are certainly not ten times more numerous today than they were a century ago; indeed, it takes some audacity to argue that we have as many. (It's far from clear, for example, whether anyone alive today can bear close comparison with Poincaré.)
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
But if conditions today are so spectacularly more favorable to successful research in the mathematical sciences than a century ago, and the number of trained researchers has grown by at least an order of magnitude, why is there no corresponding growth in achievement?
1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Mathematics itself may be the most illuminating case to study, because a "depletion of low-hanging fruit" explanation of modern stagnation is least tenable there. All the fundamental laws of physics may already have been discovered, but nothing like this is true in mathematics.
1 proslijeđeni tweet 39 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Indeed, mathematics is demonstrably inexhaustible, and the exceedingly long history of the art records no fallow period during which its master practitioners believed they might be unable for fundamental reasons to discover deep new results of lasting interest.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Note that this contrasts strikingly with physics: in 1894, Michelson judged it likely that "most of the grand underlying principles have been firmly established," and that "the future truths of physical science are to be looked for in the sixth place of decimals."
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
No similarly eminent mathematician has mooted a similarly pessimistic view of the art's prospects. On the contrary: great mathematicians have tended to predict extraordinary things to result from the art's inevitable assimilation and refinement of recent breakthroughs.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Because mathematicians have the freedom to devise and pursue entirely new fields of research -- a freedom successfully exploited, repeatedly, by its greatest past masters -- the formidable intricacy of its current best-established fields is no bar to its further flourishing.
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
If at any particular epoch of mathematical history no low-hanging fruit remains on some particular mathematical tree, then mathematicians may choose to plant, cultivate, and harvest the fruit of entirely new trees. Indeed, when frustrated, they have often done exactly that.
2 proslijeđena tweeta 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
So what is going on? Why is mathematical practice today not dramatically more successful than a century ago? Why is there no spectacular contemporary flourishing of the art, with entirely new fields opened up by ten times as many Poincarés, Hilberts, Cartans, and Noethers?
26 replies 4 proslijeđena tweeta 61 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
Part of this must be that today's "superior" institutional support structures support production of acceptable work, which has indeed increased tremendously in volume, and neglect to support production of revolutionary work, support for which is much different in character.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.