This is what censorship is! People on youtube have lost revenue due to censorship & freedom of speech violations, which is our jobs, when advertisers decide to censor us when we don't align with their narrative!
-
-
YouTube can do what they want with their platform. Also free speech means freedom from prosecution. Who is arresting Alex Jones?
2 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @BayAreaGooner88 @RealAlexJones
Removing a channel online is censorship! I was arrested 4 months ago, for something someone took out of context! Spent time in jail! The police have had my computer equipment for 4 months now, which is the same as Alex losing his channel! Both prevent income!
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MobileDigital63 @crochetgeek and
YouTube doesn't guarantee you income... If they don't like the shit you peddle, they don't have to pay you for it...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
When advertisers pull revenue, just to be assholes, to control content creators, that is censorship & violates freedom of speech!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MobileDigital63 @crochetgeek and
It quite literally is NOT a violation of freedom of speech. I don’t see why this is so difficult to grasp. YouTube doesn’t have to let anyone post on their site. They can censor whoever they want.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Did the government put up seed money or have any hand in helping start
@TeamYouTube and/@googlecloud. If the government put up money, which is taxpayers, then it would violate FREEDOM of SPEECH!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MobileDigital63 @crochetgeek and
No one is prosecuting Alex Jones as far as we’ve been told. Freedom of speech is not being violated. It’s quite simple really.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BayAreaGooner88 @hqcqms and
You took away Alex Jones
@RealAlexJones revenue and his livlihood, which is how he makes his living! That violates the 14th amendment! People have to work & have a job & should be able to making a living to buy a house & live very comfortable!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MobileDigital63 @crochetgeek and
14th amendment doesn’t apply this way wrt to private entities like corporations.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Is't not against the law or constitution to discriminate when selling products, services & using facilities?
-
-
Replying to @MobileDigital63 @crochetgeek and
You can deny services to any org for any reason. I don’t think you know case law on this. The civil rights act doesn’t cover political affiliation or any other kind of affiliation beyond religious affiliation and racial/sexual characteristics.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ladyattis @BayAreaGooner88 and
OK, so we are talking about people being banned for political choices & supporting what is right? I believe I was banned thru pulling advertising dollars to my channel, along with other content creators on youtube for supporting President Obama!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.