Some are suggesting that humanistic research should be “fact checked” by science departments before publication. The people making this suggestion believe themselves to be feminists. It is... not a good idea, and it isn’t consistent with the principle of academic freedom.
-
Show this thread
-
It occurred to me that people might be interested in the basis for the claims I make about my research in the interview. Here’s a short piece I wrote for Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers.https://legacywomenwriters.org/2020/09/22/what-is-a-female-author/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Here’s the Eliot essay that so upsets people: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/709221?journalCode=ci …
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Here’s another interview I did with
@BerlantBro last year on a related topic:https://thenewinquiry.com/im-so-into-avoiding-you/ …2 replies 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
And here’s the first part of the current draft of the introduction to my work-in-progress, PLEASURE AND EFFICACY:https://grace.substack.com/p/one-weird-trick …
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Grace Lavery: PLEASE MISS available for pre-order! Retweeted Grace Lavery: PLEASE MISS available for pre-order!
Oh, and here is a thread explaining the difference between “academic freedom” and “free speech”: fundamentally different kinds of rights-claim that anti-trans bigots have sought to collapse into each other, with some success:https://twitter.com/graceelavery/status/1141733087719460865 …
Grace Lavery: PLEASE MISS available for pre-order! added,
Grace Lavery: PLEASE MISS available for pre-order! @graceelaveryNo, no, no. My objection to the Times letter was that it misused the phrase “academic freedom.” That term describes the academy’s collective right to seek truth unfettered by external influence. Stonewall is charged with regulates the speech and conduct of staff, not their ideas. https://twitter.com/ewansomerville/status/1141498771790061568 … pic.twitter.com/sfq6vTkPyVShow this thread1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Thanks to all my colleagues and friends who have written to share that my work has been useful to them, or to their students. It has been disturbing and painful—though of course by this point also unsurprising—to find my scholarship at the centre of a massive online dogpile.
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likesShow this thread -
My hope for my critics remains the same: that they will consider rereading George Eliot’s wonderful journals and letters, which detail complex, powerful, and ambivalent ideas about gender, sexuality, and authorship. You can start here:https://books.google.com/books?id=AY2Cg6G83qMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=george+eliot+letters&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmrtq4oZzxAhVIVc0KHf7lAnkQ6AEwBnoECAkQAw …
2 replies 1 retweet 27 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @graceelavery
Ugghhghhg I’m so sorry, Grace! Pls lmk if there’s anything I can do to help support
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MistressSnowPhD
aw thanks love. i’ve got a qualifying exam and an editorial meeting today so i’ll be busy and in my element—but lez hang again soon? xox
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
let me teach you a lesson
mesmerizing & precarious
nightmare shadow(ban) person
She/Her/Dr.
