He didn’t use the original recording. So therefore it’s an original cover of the song. And you didn’t read his whole tweet. On YouTube the publisher takes 100% while on Spotify a cover song just like his the publisher only takes 25% revenue
-
-
Also. There is a Reason Wierd Al isn't getting sued and shut down or demonitized. He went through the proper channels. He still makes music parodies.
-
Well I’m not gonna argue any further I mean honestly I don’t have all the facts. So you might be right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To do a cover, you need permission from the artist, no? If they didn't, then it is stealing. Eating grapes before buying them in store, crossing in mid street. All illegal. Silly AF, I don't like it. But thems the facts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.