That's because EOS network has so many downfalls to fix in compare to Tezos. EOS launch has proven it. #4billionandnocodeaudit
-
-
-
EOS is a junk in my opinion. But EOS did get the bug bounty right. The point of using hackerone is to pay hackers to find your bugs. Which Tezos isn't doing. I think this was an oversight.
-
Not an oversight. All of the best hackers in the field (including the EOS hackers) were invited and can see the $$$ amounts. The public facing page may not show it yet, but the hackers in the HackerOne community can see it. I assure you the Tezos rewards are also high. ;)
-
What's the reasoning for not showing the amounts publicly?
-
The problem is this is what embezzlement would look like. 1) Announce crowd sourced bug bounty 2) Keep everything private, only invite friends. 3) Friends claim bounty, and share with announcers, who rule on bounty. Obviously this is not happening but rather why it looks bad.
-
A very large percentage of HackerOne bug bounty programs, if not the majority, operate in this manner. HackerOne invited the hackers, it's a fully managed program. It is common to start out like this before rolling out the fully public program, which they will.
-
Is there a good reason to be private? Both EOS & Augur launched open. Anyone can review the bug activity, see the rewards, & participate. Otherwise, while not intended, looks like bug activity or something is being hidden.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.