Seriously? How is he anti-free speech?
-
-
-
Recent banned accounts Godfrey Elfwick, Gavin Mcinnes, and now Alex Jones is suspended for 7 days. The smaller accounts no one notices. https://twitter.com/MindsFiction/status/1029826731430109186 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
I don't believe banning and suspending accounts for breaking terms and conditions made by a private sector organization that they all agreed to follow is considered anti-free speech.
-
1) Communication monopolies are targeting citizens they politically disagree with & silencing them. 2) These people have spent years creating their digital property which is being destroyed. At a minimum it's a radical expression of power. Antithetical to the bill of rights
-
I agree with your first point 100%. It actually scares the hell out of me. People’s digital property is being curated and stored on a public platform owned by private shareholders, not themselves. It’s not truly their property. Plus, that isn’t infringing on someone’s rights.
-
We fully agree on the first point. Second point, I am trying out. Seems someone like Alex Jones who probably has a decade's worth of work invested in YouTube should at least get some sort of eviction notice, similar to renters. Allowing him to export his digital work.
-
Ah ok that makes sense. I like that idea. I wonder how that could be done without him or anyone else doing harm? Similar to you renter analogy. Many renters obviously will trash a place.
-
My second point is weak. And distracts from freedom of speech which is what matters. Thank your for talking this through with me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
for
@jack money > freedom. It's profitable to cooperate with the#DeepState -
I would guess Jack's ideology > Rights humans spent millennia fighting to secure.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.