Lol. “Estimated” data and selective sources. By your own logic, all day, these are BS. You should expect better of yourself considering the high bar you’ve established for fact and proof.
-
-
I cited you original research from someone who directly went through case reports to compile a fact-based evaluation of the number of deaths that occurred in the same hospital admission as the circumcision, probably took years of work, and you dismiss it with "BS". Learn to read
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brownburr42 @KhazWolf and
BS? There a several acronyms you can consider when educating yourself or others on the benefits of circumcision. CPS, AAP, CDC, WHO are a few good ones but I hope you’re up to speed on those already.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CircsUp @brownburr42 and
#i2@AmAcadPeds@CDCgov@WHO are in general highly respected organizations, however on the subject of male circumcision there is evidence they are and have been called out by other equally respected medical organizations as culturally biased and susceptible to confirmation bias2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Mindofown @brownburr42 and
The science hasn’t changed regardless of the “tread lightly” approach of gov agencies. They still support the science and avoid the eggshells. UTI, STI, Cancer continue to be listed as benefits.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CircsUp @Mindofown and
The so-called benefits that you are citing are proportionally minor, and indeed, the conclusion that these are benefits is tenuous in itself, the UTI citation is from doubtful analysis, and new studies indicate increased STI susceptibility in circumcised men...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @brownburr42 @Mindofown and
The risks are even less and you attempt to downplay your own - argument in effort to undermine + facts. The data is published and cited to this day by all major medical journals/agencies and aside from new feeble attempts to pass on illegitimate articles and .orgs as superlative.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CircsUp @brownburr42 and
#i2 Confirmation Bias & Willful Ignorance make you feel so good don't they, The highly respected RACP which did a worldwide literature review on circumcision has stated circumcision causes morbidity & mortality in children and that it is not required for child health1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Mindofown @brownburr42 and
#i2 CPS, WHO, AAP vs RACP. That’s 3 to 1. It’s unfair of you to poke ignorance when the numbers don’t lie. If I lived in Australia it may carry more weight for me, but still the scale tips the wrong way for you.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
#i2 again you are being deliberately selective & lacking curiosity leading 2 confirmation bias 2 willful ignorance, I understand & accept I will never be able to convince you. UR 2 invested in circumcision only reason I chose 2 respond today is so your public views r challenged
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.