Okay so just assuming you're not lying, are you saying everything that's not a top 12 cause of infant death doesn't matter? If some parents decided to shoot their kids in the leg with a gun at birth, and the death rate from that didn't make the top 12, you'd sign off on it?
-
-
The science hasn’t changed regardless of the “tread lightly” approach of gov agencies. They still support the science and avoid the eggshells. UTI, STI, Cancer continue to be listed as benefits.
-
#i2 Science replete w confirmation bias, & w excludes data which contradicts its desired conclusions is willful ignorance, by definition not rigorous science as meant 2b. The non-circumcision first world has the best health outcomes why is this never stated in USA circ research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice breakdown of said cultural bias here:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527603_Cultural_bias_in_American_medicine_the_case_of_infant_male_circumcision …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.