Editorial doesn’t even mention US, but gloats Soleimani (whom it also doesn’t name) was killed at the hands of his “allies”.
-
-
Show this thread
-
It draws on historical examples from the early days of Islam when, IS said, Muslims’ enemies fought and broke each other, allowing Muslims freedom to organise their ranks and activities and eventually capture territory and expand. Gives example of “Roman-Persian wars”.
Show this thread -
It welcomes IS enemies being busy fighting each other, saying it distracts them away from “Muslims” and drains their energy which, it adds, benefits jihadists.
Show this thread -
The killing of Soleimani “has created changes in the path of the Crusader campaign against the Islamic State and its soldiers, which we believe is part of God’s support for His patient mujahidin”.
Show this thread -
It says, thanking God, US and Iran are today busy targeting each other “indifferent to the impact it has on their mutual fight against the Islamic State”.
Show this thread -
Elsewhere in al-Naba, IS factually reports on US suspension of its operations against IS in Iraq, and notes “European” concern about the impact it may have on empowering IS
Show this thread -
This is the typical position of jihadists in such situations: they gloat and pray that God weakens their enemies’ at the hands of one another, for the benefit of jihadists
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
beginning Arabic student question: in the purple text box, just to be clear, is the 1st letter there a waaw? (also 1st letter of 3rd line?). i presume so, but the font is unfamiliar
-
Correct, it’s a “waaw” و or واو
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.