And to this point, yes I meant to be insulting because it correlates to the topic at hand. I am able to insult (for comedic purposes or not) because this is an open platform and I have the right to my voice, whether its insulting or not.
-
-
Replying to @MilkiestMan @MegaRobot2798 and
And I have the right to say your sort of discourse is weak and a waste of time. I also have the right to challenge ever word. And the platform has a right to not spread it. Everyone has rights, not just you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMaterialistGrl @MegaRobot2798 and
You need to get over the habit of putting words into other peoples mouth. Even just a quick glance at your profile and its evident that thats your forte. Yes you do have rights, I never fucking said only I do. You can disagree all you want but insults are also part of free speech
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MilkiestMan @MegaRobot2798 and
I reject your premise, I extrapolate exactly what people say, but I don't let them hide the quiet part under layers of pseudo-intellectual hand waving. Personal insults are the weakest arguments. Say what you want, but don't expect a company to enable it on their platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMaterialistGrl @MegaRobot2798 and
Enabling what, a right to free speech. He wasn't rallying people to cause harm unlike Carlos and was expressing his viewpoint. He has that right, and YouTube isn't enabling him, he uploads on their platform and receives money for the audience he brings in. That's it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MilkiestMan @MegaRobot2798 and
Oh my. If you don't understand that using gay slurs is a insight to violence you obviously need to educate yourself. LGBTQIA+ are actively being killed, here in the US. This language which dehumanizes drives exactly that behavior. You know this. If you don't educate yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMaterialistGrl @MegaRobot2798 and
Wow what a fucking assumption. First off, no. A slur doesn't insight violence so and stop reaching. Also nice way of avoiding the fact that Carlos has outright asked for violence. You only defend him because you relate to his situation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MilkiestMan @MegaRobot2798 and
I want to be clear, I reject the idea that throwing anything at anyone is a valid form of political discourse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMaterialistGrl @MegaRobot2798 and
And yet you defend a person that publically enticed this sort of behavior and (to my knowledge ateast) still hasn't deleted it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MilkiestMan @MegaRobot2798 and
I have not defended anyone, I have not once defended anything that Crowder's victim has done, but rather I am saying that the actions of Crowder are in and of themselves worth of the actions Google has taken, and more. Stop changing the subject.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That is a fair point. I suppose I have jumped the gun in assuming you were defending him, and yes Google is in a position where they can terminate him if need be. Problem is, he didn't break any ToS and removing him for his words is blatant censorship.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.