Conversation

Technology has continually been predicted to stop moving forward but that Jim plans to ignore that the rest of his life as it hasn't been true so far.
1
1
8
Q re adversarial protection on Tesla vehicles. Stop signs on a short. says stop signs are fine - they'll be geocoded - and that the real issue will be "bullying" of AI cars. You'll always be able to cut off a self driving car as it won't fight a human on that.
3
4
18
notes simpler adversarial issues exist - highly reflective back of trucks, roads painted on walls (Wile E Coyote!) - that much of life will provide inadvertent adversarial problems to deal with.
1
2
14
Q re ethics: Military AI will be a fearful fight when nation states decide that AI is a competitive capability for warfare.
2
1
6
asks whether self driving cars will have unintended societal consequences - urban sprawl, ... Also questions whether progress in public transportation would be better. states that no one wants better public transportation if they can get personal cars.
6
13
22
Q re who will buy these self driving cars and who will gain benefits of automation if it - will it be Airbnb of your car? Cars will be more accessible as car costs will be shared (minimal overhead for not always in use). 3D tunnels will allow less congestion.
2
5
notes that progress is slow - Tesla released their car in 2006 showing the future but auto execs were straight up blind. Flat earthers but in tech.
1
2
10
End of conversation. My missed question ( + ): kept noting neural link will allow direct domain knowledge into brain (ala Matrix) but isn't that a terrifying vulnerability? We saw in the last year how vulnerable to coercion humans are, ...
2
2
13
... do we really want to open a new attack surface (ala Snow Crash ). Already concerned with modern ML being used at personalized scale against people when just armed with search history and vague interests, let alone my brain waves O_o
4
2
20