What about those who enthusiastically approved and published these studies? Shall we sent them to The International Court of Justice? 
-
-
-
They were the subject of the study itself, so no, that is not a viable line of attack. The best line of attack is that this was not a study on humans but a study on a system, the human science academic peer-review system, that appears to be incredibly corrupt.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So basically they've decided to validate his conclusions in a way that is more convincing than anything in the study.
-
Yup
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
In other words: Portland SU is a joke.
-
When I went there we called it “High school with ash trays.” Now it doesn’t even have the ash trays.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@peterboghossian What can I do, as a student at PSU, to support you? -
You can learn what the IRB is and why you need research involving other humans to be reviewed by an ethics board
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.