What parts do you disagree with?
the thing about your thesis is that it's exactly Facebook's reason to continue to exist — the idea that they are a net positive rather than a net negative in the world it's also incredibly convenient because we cant reliably quantify or measure this
-
-
I wrote specifically about the discussion around COVID-19. Do you believe the discussion on Twitter was in fact a net negative?
-
well i think teh point stands even on a micro level when limited to corona. Other folks have made arguments to this extent in the past but i dont have the level of confidence to agree. i think it's the central question of our time in covering techcos!
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
so facebook (and other internet companies this distribute information) can continue, comforted in the unquantifiable idea that they are doing more good than ill (also makes total sense why
@boztank shared it in the first place) I am not confident in making such a broad statement -
Is your default position that FB shouldn't exist?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
are you saying that the thesis must be incorrect, because it would imply that Facebook has a reason to exist, which we know to be false?
-
no, scroll down further in the thread....
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
Näytä lisää vastauksia, myös mahdollisesti häiritsevää aineistoa sisältäviä
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.