“@Nightline: Police not releasing the name of the officer who shot and killed an unarmed Missouri teen: http://abcn.ws/1ppkdwR ”
>absurd.
-
-
En réponse à @MidwinCharles
@MidwinCharles do you think it’s due to security concerns?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @JohnWilson
@JohnWilson >>that's the claim. But it isn't how our justice system works; victims identities are protected, not alleged killers.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @MidwinCharles
@MidwinCharles this isn’t some drug dealer. It’s a law enforcement official who may have made a horrible decision.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @JohnWilson
@JohnWilson >>due process and law are the same for all; we don't operate under a tiered system of justice.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @MidwinCharles
@MidwinCharles I didn’t suggest tiered system. I suggested acknowledging when there is a higher threat due to circumstances.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @JohnWilson
@JohnWilson >>the public must at least know the identity; integrity in the process requires it; they can always protect him.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @MidwinCharles
@MidwinCharles I agree. But I think they wanted to wait until he was protected.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @JohnWilson
.
@JohnWilson >>they are the police; they can and already are protecting him; they did not, however, protect Michael Brown.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @MidwinCharles
@MidwinCharles I thought more about what you said yesterday. You’re right. The threats are overblown & the officer’s name should be released2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
.@JohnWilson
>>it's one way for #Ferguson police to gain the trust and respect of the community they serve.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.