Midas Nouwens

@MidasNouwens

Digital rights academic . I explore labour and privacy law through building computational alternatives.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @MidasNouwens

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @MidasNouwens

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    12. sij

    New paper (for ) on dark patterns in consent pop-ups after the GDPR. We (w/ I Liccardi L Kagal) scraped 10K UK sites and found the biggest pop-up providers are configured illegally 88.2% of the time, with big impacts on answers 1/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Forskerteam med bl.a. ph.d.-studerende fra har undersøgt de mest populære samtykke pop-ups på de 10.000 mest besøgte websider i UK. De fandt frem til at kun 11,8% overholder -reglerne. Læs mere:

    Poništi
  3. 22. sij

    Our browser extension that automatically answers GDPR pop-ups -- Consent-O-Matic -- got recommended by as an important method to improve your privacy! w/ ; Janus Bager Kristensen; Rolf Bagge;

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Ah no GDPR fines in Ireland and Luxembourg.. 🙄 pretty stark when you see it mapped out like this. Great map from

    Poništi
  5. 22. sij

    New article by (Danish BBC) followed up on my and 's study of consent pop-ups. The Danish , responsible for web tracking regulation, is giving non-compliant advice. Even (DK Parliament) is violating law.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    Unpaid care work by women added at least $10.8 trillion a year in value to the world economy, which is three times more than the tech industry, Oxfam cited in its ‘Time to Care’ report, released ahead of in Davos

    Poništi
  7. 17. sij

    Belgium newspaper covered our study on illegal designs of consent pop-ups on the web (), with comments from and myself:

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. sij

    Our study on dark patterns and consent in web tracking, an Aarhus-MIT-UCL collaboration, has been picked up and profiled by the BBC . One step closer to non tech policy friends knowing what I do! (paper: )

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 14. sij

    They also support consent signals given at the browser level (via extensions or signals in HTTP header!) for whatever the next version of the ePrivacy regulation is. This is the most important battleground to protect usability on the web, but has been heavily lobbied against.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 14. sij

    À propos our article on dark patterns in consent pop-ups, publishes interview today with CNIL president on large scale illegality and new guidance document: reject should be as easy as accept, both answers should be valid for same length of time:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 12. sij

    If scientific papers are not your thing, has written up our findings in a rigorous and thorough way here: 9/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 12. sij

    If you don't want to wait for enforcement, we also built a browser extension that automatically answers consent pop-ups for you based on your privacy preferences. 8/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 12. sij

    Enforcement is lacking and DPAs lack budget/staff () — and perhaps don’t know where to start. Regulating 3rd party consent services to not allow misconfiguration could be a much more effective way to increase compliance than targeting individual sites. 7/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 12. sij

    Showing more options on 1st page than just Accept or Decline always decreased consent: showing vendors by 20%pts; purposes by 8.8%pts; and both by 11.9%pts. This follows what found: 6/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 12. sij

    We found that removing the decline button from the 1st page increased consent by ~23%pts. In fact, anything on the 2nd page might as well not exist: 93.1% of interactions were limited to the 1st page. 5/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 12. sij

    To see how designs affect acceptance rates, we injected fake pop-ups into participants' sites (n=40), comparing: - banners vs. barriers; - presence vs. absence of reject button on 1st page; - 0 vs 1 clicks required to access vendor/purpose controls 4/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 12. sij

    This is before you even look at what actually happens (or doesn’t happen) after you click accept/reject, which have shown can be very little: 3/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 12. sij

    5 pop-up (consent management platform) firms have ~58% of the UK market ( ). Only 11.8%(!) meet even the most basic(!) legal UX reqs for valid consent: no pre-checked boxes, explicit consent, reject as easy as accept. 2/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 1. sij

    "These personal computers were positioned as accessible because they borrowed directly from the logic of day jobs— but certainly not everyone’s day job. For instance, there are no commercial interfaces that are modeled after working farms, or assembly lines, or grocers."

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I'm teaching this upcoming term and when looking for & assembling resources for my students about research paradigms I've been noticing a lot of misconceptions in online resources. This is a thread about misconceptions & PCK I've learnt from teaching this before.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·