BerniecratMountain

@MichaelWiggint4

MississippiMountainMan/Berniecrat/ Hunter/Farmer-century farm/Southern Appalachian Progressive Instagram:

Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @MichaelWiggint4

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @MichaelWiggint4

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    29. sij
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Let me get this straight - With 62% of results in, Iowa is now reporting won the first round vote & won the final round vote but is LOSING the delegate count?? Yeah, that sounds right.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    With the incomplete results released, Sanders has more votes than Buttigieg but Buttigieg has more delegates. I have a feeling that the people who spent the last 4 years complaining about how unfair & undemocratic such outcomes are won’t be quite as angry about this.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata

    In Iowa's 10 most populous counties, just 375 of 641 precincts have been reported. Bernie is leading in 7 of these counties, so this will only get better for him as we see more results. Add that to leads in 12 straight NH primary polls and Bernie's gotta like where he's sitting.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 50 minuta

    I can't get over how lucky Pete is, he should play the lottery. 1.Des Moines poll with Sanders winning was shelved. 2. His pals app screwed up, stopping Sanders from claiming victory. 3. Iowa released the vote totals in exactly the place where he's leading. "Luck"

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    If this is true, and Bernie "comfortably" wins (as his teams says he will) did the Iowa Dem party find a favorable 62% to report for Buttigieg to give him another round of positive press???

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  8. Poništi
  9. Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Somebody help me out. What is it called when party elites selectively release results creating a grand media narrative based on incomplete data?

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I've never seen a more blatant example of concentrated money rigging an election than Iowa Dems releasing a random percentage of the vote after self-dealing grifters tied to Buttigieg fucked up an election, followed by the NYT, WaPost, CNN, and MSNBC announcing 'partial results.'

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    POPULAR VOTE with 62% in: Sanders 28,220 Pete 27,030 Warren 22,254 Biden 14,176

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima

    If Sanders wins narrowly over Pete, he's a 48% chance of winning a majority of delegates. If Pete wins narrowly over Bernie, Bernie is a 28% chance of winning a majority. But in both cases, Sanders has the best odds of any candidate.

    Poništi
  14. Damn, they just added in two more percentage points from Buttigieg areas to make Buttigieg the front runner when they released the caucus data. And will mostly likely not release the rest of the data until after NH. Shameful.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 18 sati

    Biden called the results illegitimate which we were told Sanders would do Buttigieg declared victory early which we were told Sanders would do

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Nevada seems dramatically underpolled. Unless I’m mistaken we haven’t seen any data there since early January.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I’m not trying to be funny but Bernie also outspent everyone in Iowa and had a way more robust ground game. To get less vote and ha a below average turnout is problematic. No I’m not a Bernie fan but that doesn’t mean l can’t see a trend. Pete, Amy, and Warren did well.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    PEREZ should resign. PELOSI should resign leadership. SCHUMER should resign leadership. From to to -lite to refusing to , the Democratic Party is FAILING. Businesses, sports teams... change leadership when necessary. It's time.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The official story: They expected a record crowd They reported an average crowd They ran out of paper ballots to give to the average crowd that they expected to be a record crowd

    Poništi
  20. Poništi
  21. Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·