Conversation

Replying to
Peterson is exhibit #1 in working backwards from an ideological endpoint, cherry picking/massaging data to fit it, and then calling it science.
5
Replying to
In Peterson's new interview Lindzen misconstrues Le Chatelier's Principle: our CO2 isn't a one-time finite addition; it is continuously forced. Then Lindzen misapplies it: Because by Le Chatelier, it makes sense that warming might cause changes in mid-latitude dynamics.
2
Replying to
His video on Greta is flat out professional and scholarly misconduct. Diagnosing someone for hostile purposes, AND getting the facts wrong.
3