I argue that we need to properly identify power and tie it to true accountability. Antitrust must fill the gaps left by a patchwork regulatory state, catching the residual corporate power that otherwise falls through the cracks.
-
-
Show this thread
-
This is the lesson we learn from looking at the interconnected histories of antitrust and corporate law. We need a backstop for corporate power when it threatens to overwhelm citizens and the state, and efficiencies cannot be a mitigating factor against the subversion of freedom.
Show this thread -
We must incorporate "public policy" concerns into antitrust in order to properly identify the full scope of corporate power. When power is identified it should be dispersed through active antitrust enforcement (including breakups) or resolved through stakeholder remedies.
Show this thread -
The ultimate backstop is the dissolution of the company. If a company can only exist by systematically breaching the public interest then it should not exist. That this feels like such a radical idea shows how unbalanced the relationship between corporation and state has become.
Show this thread -
There are people working on this in Europe too! Cc
@IoannisLianos@joseazar@awpmclean@ArielEzrachi@TomValletti@kaleidoscomp@tonycurzonprice@Caffar3CristinaShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
COMPETITION IS KILLING US.