I know this is sort of a "Good for her" post which hey, good for her, but I definitely don't like news outlets sweeping the atrocious consequences of NFTs under the rug. Definitely don't get a warm and fuzzy feeling from a story like this.
What a perfect visual example of how glorifying NFTs as silly and fun are hiding the horrible damage they cause our environment.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1387801377062203392 …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
That's actually propoganda you got there. Crypto will always use electricity and electricity typically comes from coal or fossil fuels in most cases. If you switch to a solar/wind infrastructure then you'd have no emissions which we should be doing regardless.
-
Claiming it's bad for the environment is like saying an internet Cafe at full capacity is bad for the environment since they all have 3080s in the PC's. At the end of the day it's electricity and wherever you get electricity is what's damaging the environment. Vote for renewables
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
People have way too much money on their hands
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
here come the crypto weirdos rip to your mentions
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Plus is another bad side effect of inequality, only people with WAY to much money can afford this nonsense
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.