@MemberOfSpecies Maybe… maybe that points at the concept of a lower bound of ethical adequacy, with the zone of freedom above.
-
@MemberOfSpecies I doubt that… but it’s sufficiently unexplored territory that maybe my guess is not worth much!
@Meaningness A mix of utilitarianism and ethical egoism doesn't have supererogation, just irrational neglect of the egoist component.
-
-
@MemberOfSpecies Oh, yes, that’s a very interesting point.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MemberOfSpecies The direction I’ve developed this stuff would give a quite different analysis, but probably twitter can’t handle that; > -
@MemberOfSpecies > too much conceptual context required. Um, you’re going in an analytic direction and mine is more Continental-ish…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness Such neglect is "unethical" in the sense that philosophical ethics is against it, -
@MemberOfSpecies which philosophical ethics is against it? isn’t utilitarianism for it, by definition? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.