Member Of Species

@MemberOfSpecies Well, you’d probably agree they are not misleading in a deontological framework? (Not that I’m advocating deontology, but)

@MemberOfSpecies An underlying question is “how ethical should I be,” which is pressing for many people, >

@MemberOfSpecies but can’t even be stated in existing metaethical frameworks.

@Meaningness I've never been able to understand this perspective; "ethical" (in the sense used here) just seems like it means "shoulded".

@Meaningness (And maybe there's a different sense of "ethical" where it refers more to things you wouldn't already do out of base motives.)

@MemberOfSpecies Maybe… maybe that points at the concept of a lower bound of ethical adequacy, with the zone of freedom above.

@Meaningness When people ask "how ethical should I be", maybe they're modeling themselves as acting on base motives by default,

@Meaningness but being pulled in other directions like altruism or rule-following by moral reflection,