@sarahdoingthing Jim’s interpretation of “Works of Supererogation, cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety” seems important insight >
-
@sarahdoingthing I realized only recently that utilitarianism does not allow supererogation; everything not compulsory is forbidden.
@Meaningness @sarahdoingthing Supererogation seems like a social psychology concept pretending that it applies on the philosophical level.
-
-
@MemberOfSpecies This I think I’d disagree with. Criterion of adequacy could be purely individual and abstracted from social/cultural detail -
@Meaningness So perhaps I should have said something like "game theory" or "negotiation", where the players can be different (sub)selves. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.