"Something bad might happen!", while technically true, is not a great argument by itself.
-
-
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch The argument being made here is "certain a priori considerations should cause us to expect more unspecified bad things".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies I've never had an a priori consideration, so I guess I'm missing the premise of this argument.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch I meant prior to thinking about concrete bad effects.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies Okay. But you have to actually talk about what those consideration are. All I've seen is handwaving.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch think that nonspecific bad things are likely to result from policies of this type"
5:40 PM - 4 Aug 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.