@simplic10 @Meaningness I don't know. I don't have a principled philosophical answer either.
-
-
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@simplic10@Meaningness But to say "cats" exist but the rules of Chmess don't exist, one needs to identify the relevant difference.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies@simplic10@Meaningness "cats" is a characterization of how a collection of quantum whatnots behaves; so is probability2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman@simplic10@Meaningness But it seems saying "cats" isn't *just* a predictive strategy, because humans *care about* cats.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies@simplic10@Meaningness humans care about probability? they care about lots of damn fool things, some of which don't exist.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman@simplic10@Meaningness I just meant that as a side note, not as a difference between cats and "more abstract" things.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies@simplic10@Meaningness I dunno, the question of whether something exists seems orthogonal to whether anybody cares.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman@simplic10@Meaningness It seems as though we shouldn't care about anything that doesn't exist.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies@simplic10@Meaningness that's a normative question and may be harder than it looks; but surely the reverse is not true.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@MemberOfSpecies@simplic10@Meaningness we surely can't conclude something does not exist just because we don't care about it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@admittedlyhuman @simplic10 @Meaningness Yes, that sounds right.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.