@Meaningness I guess I'm trying to figure out whether there's a principled reason for saying such things aren't causal.
-
-
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies Main intuition of “cause” is counterfactuals, and there isn’t a possible world in which 5x5!=252 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness "If 5x5 had been 26, this 5x5 room would have been 26 square meters" doesn't make zero sense to me.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies but in any case, in the standard (Kripke) formulation, all mathematical facts are the same in all possible worlds.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness This feels like sweeping the problem under the rug. We have uncertainty about mathematical facts with conditional structure.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies causality is normally taken as an objective fact, not an epistemic state.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness And this is true even if I subjectively think the symmetrical coin has a 70% probability of heads.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies@Meaningness I don't see this. Why the obj 50% in a det'd universe?6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@Meaningness (Of course, if we knew *literally everything*, we'd have to assign either 100% or 0%.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies@Meaningness oh, ok. So you're just saying in some sits there is exactly one rational prob assignment. Agree I guess.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@simplic10 @Meaningness Yes, and the thing that makes it so can be pointed at as an abstraction in the world, just like cats.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.