@MemberOfSpecies I'm accusing people of lying about their emotions, or having impermissible emotive strategies.
-
-
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@MemberOfSpecies norm violation, not rationality violation, since emotions are irrational anyhow.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman So they're violating a norm of consistency? But what makes you think there is or should be such a norm?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies experience? raw burning hatred of hypocrites?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@MemberOfSpecies do you disagree that there is such a norm or are you just trolling me?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman Yes, I disagree that there is or should be such a norm.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies should is questionable if your heart is not as twisted with hate as mine is, but it sure seems like a norm that exists.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@MemberOfSpecies basically an extension of the fairness norm, against "playing favorites".3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman "Consistency", "fairness", "playing favorites" loaded ways to refer to feeling the same about relevantly different cases.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies if the norm doesn't exist, why do we have common-law precedent rules? consistency and fairness are a big deal1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@admittedlyhuman There's a norm for the law to treat similar cases similarly, no norm for feels to treat dissimilar cases similarly.
-
-
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies in a democracy, your feels are the law0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.