What do you do when people demand conformity with inaccurate political views as a price for joining an effort more important than politics?
-
-
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
One thing you can do is insist on a separation between political and other discussions, on general principles of epistemic hygiene.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
Another thing you can do is develop a practical theory of how to evade political pressure on your inner thoughts.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
This is compatible with an emphasis on cooperation, making sure to avoid needless button-pushing and biases opposite to the pressure.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
Political movements are not agents or superintelligences; they can, to some extent, be appeased and diverted without being capitulated to.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
If (nontrivial assumption) some piece of writing is genuinely well-meaning and rational, those turned away by it may not be worth keeping.
1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
On the other hand, maybe they are. For most of the important causes, allies don't grow on trees.
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MemberOfSpecies
To insist on only having reasonable, decent allies may simply be too picky.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
(The "maybe not worth keeping" point seems to have drifted out of the Overton window, though.)
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.