One thing you can do is insist on a separation between political and other discussions, on general principles of epistemic hygiene.
What do you do when people demand conformity with inaccurate political views as a price for joining an effort more important than politics?
-
-
-
Another thing you can do is develop a practical theory of how to evade political pressure on your inner thoughts.
-
This is compatible with an emphasis on cooperation, making sure to avoid needless button-pushing and biases opposite to the pressure.
-
Political movements are not agents or superintelligences; they can, to some extent, be appeased and diverted without being capitulated to.
-
If (nontrivial assumption) some piece of writing is genuinely well-meaning and rational, those turned away by it may not be worth keeping.
-
On the other hand, maybe they are. For most of the important causes, allies don't grow on trees.
-
To insist on only having reasonable, decent allies may simply be too picky.
-
(The "maybe not worth keeping" point seems to have drifted out of the Overton window, though.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.