"We could use the same logic you used to derive your non-forbidden conclusion to derive a forbidden conclusion. Therefore, you're mistaken."
-
@MemberOfSpecies I feel like it might be better to thoughtlegalize truth than to try to build up a Dark Side Logic that doesn't break down.
@admittedlyhuman "Don't transfer the alleged obvious absurdity of an offensive and forbidden conclusion to other conclusions" seems simple.
-
-
@MemberOfSpecies you're drawing a distinction between "offensive" and "false" which I'm not sure is observed, especially for moral questions -
@MemberOfSpecies I mean how does this hash out in formal logic? (x->y and x) implies y iff y is not evil? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.