There are many more ways to interfere than ways not to interfere. Non-interference requires a special explanation.
-
-
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
What is "non-interference" even? How does the non-interfering process pick out a notion of what counts as interference?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
(I'm not saying this point is new to e.g.
@willdoingthings in the aliens context; just emphasizing it as a potential focus for discussion.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
The natural result of e.g. acausal negotiation seems to be everyone lives in a semi-alien utopia, like Three Worlds Collide.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies i like my idea of intervening on a person-by-person basis, not a planet-wide basis. fits best psi theories. optimaler.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings "Fits best psi theories" seems to mean "only possible refuge from empirical evidence against psi". Hardly a recommendation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies see see no faith, nietzschean, all too nietzchean1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings My principles are only those that people who correctly thought they were obvious thought were obvious.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.