There are many more ways to interfere than ways not to interfere. Non-interference requires a special explanation.
-
-
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
What is "non-interference" even? How does the non-interfering process pick out a notion of what counts as interference?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
(I'm not saying this point is new to e.g.
@willdoingthings in the aliens context; just emphasizing it as a potential focus for discussion.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
The natural result of e.g. acausal negotiation seems to be everyone lives in a semi-alien utopia, like Three Worlds Collide.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies big obvious godly optimizations might interfere with subtler mechanisms for incentivizing and/or testing virtue2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@MemberOfSpecies and idk it seems humans are fucking terrible and if the gods help us then it'll be virtue-increasing not QALY-increasing3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings My guess is that virtue is a component of the relevant terminal value set but by no means the whole thing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies what if i say I don't believe in terminal values other than alignment with God, and other values come from that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings I could see something like "alignment with God" as a negotiation outcome, not so much a negotiation target.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.