There are many more ways to interfere than ways not to interfere. Non-interference requires a special explanation.
-
-
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
What is "non-interference" even? How does the non-interfering process pick out a notion of what counts as interference?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
(I'm not saying this point is new to e.g.
@willdoingthings in the aliens context; just emphasizing it as a potential focus for discussion.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
The natural result of e.g. acausal negotiation seems to be everyone lives in a semi-alien utopia, like Three Worlds Collide.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies big obvious godly optimizations might interfere with subtler mechanisms for incentivizing and/or testing virtue2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@MemberOfSpecies and idk it seems humans are fucking terrible and if the gods help us then it'll be virtue-increasing not QALY-increasing3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings If my life doesn't seem optimized for me being virtuous, does that mean I get to count this hypothesis as falsified?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemberOfSpecies
@MemberOfSpecies you made bad decisions as a child. you're faithless you're not even trying. (Mostly joking)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings It's probably because of bad decisions you made as an acausal fetus.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.