Tail of a tweetstorm by @SethAbramson about metamodernism, which I think is The Right Thing and important.
(Prompted by a @jordanbpeterson interview which I haven’t seen and don’t have an opinion about)
@MatthausAnsatzhttps://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/998016959202709504 …
-
Show this thread
-
This tweetstorm is useful as a summary of metamodernism, regardless of what you think about
@jordanbpeterson. (@SethAbramson argues that JBP is not a metamodernist, which would be good; but a premodernist, which would be bad. I don’t know.)4 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Postmodernism has “long outstayed its welcome” as
@SethAbramson put it. What comes next? Metamodernism should, in my opinion, incorporate the best of traditionalism, modernism, and postmodernism—with a meta-systematic perspective that goes beyond each:https://meaningness.com/fluidity-desiderata …8 replies 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
I've argued for this against both PMs and anti-PM 'rationalists', but it was under the guise of Integral Theory (
@TheKenWilber doesn't get enough credit despite faults). I still think metaphysics needs a revolution before 'meaning' is taken seriously by scientific/pop consensus1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @haig @jordanbpeterson and
Yes… I think we have the metaphysical tools we need for that. http://meaningness.com/ is a work-in-progress explaining them.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
> You discuss culture as initially 'accepted without question’. Is that any different to any 'culture' we see today? I think so. Culture is extensively contested.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.