My work is often compared with @jordanbpeterson’s.
I’ve had trouble understanding quite where he’s coming from.
This podcast made clear that yes, we do say similar things about many issues.
I did want to “on the other hand” him sometimes, though.https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/995332885224837120 …
-
-
This point stuck out for me—probably as much for the phrasing, and its even-handed contempt for all sides, as for the content. (I am not sure whether this accurately characterizes
@jordanbpeterson’s position; nor does@ContraPoints, as she immediately admits.)pic.twitter.com/z9uzgSVQPu
Show this thread -
The
@ContraPoints performance explicitly endorses several of@jordanbpeterson’s points. Notably: the contemporary left has a lot to say about what is bad, and not enough about what would be better. A realistic vision of a future good society is critically lacking on all sides.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yeah I was going to say, like a bad product manager, he is right about the problems identified in user research, he's wrong in the eternalist, universal solutions he proposes. I very much see what he's saying as promoting a regression in your stages of development. 1/x
-
he's 100% right that pomo scrambles 19 year old brains. that doesn't necessarily make the things pomo points out "wrong". and I flat out disagree with his solution, which to me is read (maybe uncharitably) as a paean to hierarchy, modernist organization, and ultimately power
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The Contrapoints video above is a very talented and humourous response to Peterson. I say this as a Peterson fan who enjoys hearing intelligent responses to his stuff because it allows the sort of dialectic that is needed nowadays.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.