Your position seems to me like saying that if we can't see the shortest path through a maze, then it must have no shortest path or at least the concept of a shortest path must not be useful. Seems useful to me. I don't get your weird ban? What else can be said?
-
-
One piece of belated but (I think) important feedback: Reading "A bridge to meta-rationality" & the Kegan model summary post linked from there, I repeatedly caught myself thinking, "uh-huh, true, this feels like my own journey, good to know I'm totes meta-rational". >
-
That’s great! Many readers have the reaction “this is gibberish/obviously wrong.” It’s pretty binary. These pieces definitely do not make all/most readers feel good.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
[Hey david - apologies if I asked you this already, but have you read Peirce or other pragmatist writers? Any plans to address meaningness's relation to pragmatism? - I did a google insite search and didn't see the subject addressed on your site, but idk if that still works].
-
I mostly know the pragmatists only from secondary sources. I’ve read small bits here and there. I like what they have to say, and feel broadly aligned with their project. Meaningness isn’t a philosophy book, so it mostly doesn’t do literature review.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
